Email Response

On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:49:23 -0000 “christiankc13” <deleted> writes:

“ I am not ready to lose my faith and i refuse to. That would be giving up my best friend, real or imagined. Who wants to loose a friend that has promised you eternal life? If there was no God, then I would die and that’s it, no afterlife, so technically I’d never really know that i was wrong or right.”                                       _____________________________________________________

How egocentric. That is true, you will die and know nothing, god named God or not. You will die, your god (the one named God) will fade from your brain, and its existence will cease. That leaves nothing open to discussion. Your imaginary friend will disappear and your fantasies will end. You will not know nor care what truths you avoided for your whole wasted lifetime in the name of that pretended friend while you serve those who created it for you, and enrich them while you suffer the stress that comes from living a lie. You will, of course, deny that and insist you feel quite happy. You have made your choice and will stand by it. That leaves nothing the rest of us can do for you.

Because you made a choice, you assume in error that atheism is an alternative choice. We who are apostates know atheism as a simple absence of goddish belief, with which some of us struggled for years to avoid acknowledgement. Unreinforced belief ebbs when life gets overwhelming, dedication goes unrequited, prayers go without response, you are blamed for your own illness and debt, and recognition of cognitive dissonance begins. It is not that belief gets rejected; it erodes away till nothing of it remains. The choice it leaves behind is between honesty and insanity. To become an apostate involves only a choice between apostasy and hypocrisy. Atheism arrives on its own, and rides in on the failure of God’s messengers to be believable.

Atheism involves an open acceptance of falsifiable facts and principles of logic learned as we go. That no god exists can be rendered false by the verified presence of a god. Any god will do. That is true of all the multiple thousands of them, including those effigies represented by idols. It remains true of those same multiple thousands that not one of them can make that claim. For your claim that “a god does exist” to be falsified requires the complete disappearance of something that has never been present.

That is illogical and absurd, even were you willing to proclaim, “That is exactly what has happened,” that your claim of immaterialism amounts to. Where would you find witnesses from that time whose signed documents attest to that as fact? In your bible? I see a god of several names in there, ordering genocides and abortions, but no signatures witnessed by others of those ancient times, and only the words of apologists making their excuses.

People never exposed to reasons to question their beliefs are innocent of wrongdoing except for their criminal acts. People who chose honesty over insanity and hypocrisy feel no need to apologize for that. We may need to find excuses for whatever else we’ve become, but never for a god’s absence. That is for you to do. Yet, you insist upon its presence by gas-lighting, the opposite of a correct approach. The god named God awaits in abeyance for you to draw it forth. What I don’t believe in is not mine to demonstrate; what you profess to exist is yours to demonstrate. If you show nothing, that is the same as my belief. I did not choose that. When I looked for a god, that’s what I found. If I cannot trust my own senses, I surely can’t trust yours.

We have equal rights by law. By that same law we can judge each other only for criminal acts and not for our beliefs, as some would have it. We will not be arrested for our beliefs unless they incite a criminal act. The right to state our beliefs and speak out in their defense is a matter of good stewardship honored in our laws. As  awareness of cognitive dissonance increases, the number of people forced to make that choice between honesty, insanity and hypocrisy will increase. Keep up the good work.

Isaiah 32

“Behold, a king shall reign in righteousness, and princes shall rule in judgment. 2 And a man shall be as an hiding place from the wind, and a covert from the tempest; as rivers of water in a dry place, as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land. 3 And the eyes of them that see shall not be dim, and the ears of them that hear shall hearken. 4 The heart also of the rash shall understand knowledge, and the tongue of the stammerers shall be ready to speak plainly. 5 The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. 6 For the vile person will speak villany, and his heart will work iniquity, to practise hypocrisy, and to utter error against the LORD, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail. 7 The instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right. 8 But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.”

Proverbs 11:23-28

“23 The desire of the righteous is only good: but the expectation of the wicked is wrath. 24 There is that scattereth, and yet increaseth; and there is that withholdeth more than is meet, but it tendeth to poverty. 25 The liberal soul shall be made fat: and he that watereth shall be watered also himself. 26 He that withholdeth corn, the people shall curse him: but blessing shall be upon the head of him that selleth it. 27 He that diligently seeketh good procureth favour: but he that seeketh mischief, it shall come unto him. 28 He that trusteth in his riches shall fall: but the righteous shall flourish as a branch.”

In a time when paper has replaced seeds as money, the admonition must still stand as some two-trillion dollars remain held from circulation and investment, its apparent purpose as bribe money to influence politicians and that selfsame God toward Armageddon. Those who’d think to control God must believe themselves special, to deserve that kind of power.

Let me continue to be regarded as the mischief that torments the mischief makers, those who belittle the impoverished and seek favors from the rich. In my studies of the Bible as a youth, I learned to equate God with good and love, and Satan with hatred and evil. I had no real way to pick from all the conflicting messages about it how to recognize which is good and which is evil. Even love and hate morphed into each other as preachers preached and neighbors talked and I was punished for deeds I had thought would help. I stopped listening to the speechers and the preachers and turned to the written word for my own mode of self-expression. That represents evidence: against me, if I need correction; against deniers, sneaky patrons of Satan who defend their errors with bluster and lies—it matters little if he exists—they do and they proclaim belief in a god named God and they serve causes that have to be designated as Satan’s, whatever I do or don’t believe about him, and so plainly showing whom they honor with the title, God.

I had seen that those who spoke would deny some things they said, and the evidence, words left hanging in the air, remained invisible. It appealed to me that I could compare what had been written to check my memory, and to show when others proclaimed otherwise. I often wondered, during all that time, why the god named God had chosen to stay invisible. It says in John 1:1 that God is a word. It says, in fact, that God was the word. You can understand that in several ways, all of which may be true. No other explanation of it made any durable sense. God, by all accounts, is invisible. Words are invisible. Even printed words remain invisible until reading gives them meaning and you hear them in your head. The sound is what gives them meaning; otherwise they may as well be splotches of dirt. The Big Bang could be God. Can you prove it is not?

As I grew, I learned that, through the ages, the name ‘God’ had stood for many things. God had several names scattered through the Bible, and each of those names presented a different personality. When you have read those various names enough times, to hear it in your head or to hear it said elicits a sense of those various personalities so that you can make a foggy mental picture: Mean God; Nice God; Creator God; Father God; God the son of God; God the spirit of God… on and on till in our own time, God, the idols of God, foisted by America’s gains-seeking rentiers. (pronounced kinda like wren’-shas, at least in the southern USA). Wiktionary.

From Wikipedia: “Rentier capitalism is a term currently used to describe economic practices of parasitic monopolization of access to any (physical, financial, intellectual, etc.) kind of property, and gaining significant amounts of profit without contribution to society.” Rentiers are only interested in one or both of two things: how to gain the most money and/or power. Unlike the average person who takes care of multiple concerns and may someday risk life and limb to help another, today’s rentier will consider potentials of gains versus losses before submitting to a financial risk. Power needs go toward maximizing control so that conditions are the greatest possible to favor maximal gains for the rentier’s acquisitions and deals. He or she will willingly spend thousands or millions on inflamed advertising to assure a return of millions or billions.

The biblical churl and the rentier are of a kind from different times and conditions. Selfish, ignorant but cunning, seeking unearned advantages over others, neither contributes much to the social systems wherein they flourish by draining the wealth away from those whose efforts earned it. Absentee landlords, those in charge of conglomerates so large they cannot know details of their daily operations, figureheads of gigantic corporations far-flung over the face of the Earth, all of whom know little about their enterprise beyond a couple of layers beneath their station, are the rentiers of our era. Their interest in people gets expressed as gains and losses, cost versus benefit to the enterprise, and the manipulation of conditions and production toward the greatest returns to justify their own personal increase.

In our time, both major political parties appear to pander after the rentiers, philosophically and rhetorically as they answer to the call of cash and hired lobbyists. Pledge-signing Republicans and Tea-Partiers cater to voters’ emotions by injecting religion and other animal-level gropes into speeches reminiscent of those old movies about Hitler. Backed by a bevy of Limbaugh clones and rentier-promised funding they now blatantly engage in ongoing anything goes nonstop performances of slander against not only their rivals, but also anybody whose lifestyle, religion or physical image differs from theirs, all in an effort to maintain a ready scapegoat to blame for the results of their own misdeeds. Right now a dollar is worth less than a penny compared to the beginning of my life; accordingly an average factory worker earns half or less for his 40-hour week. Rentiers, however, may be banking on a future when they have all the nation’s wealth in their idle hands, when scarcity will increase the dollar’s value and they will control a world while wearing iron gloves.

That calamitous criminal catastrophe can be forestalled only by making clear who those people are, banishing their bribe-making henchmen from access to those people to whom we voted and assigned responsibility for watching after our interests, downsizing megalithic corporations and, now  that they can be recognized as people, making them as accessible to lawsuits and arrest. If a corporation cannot be arrested, then that decision must be recognized as fallacious and reversed. Oligarchy seems inevitable if people who make no real societal contribution continue to be allowed to amass huge fortunes without limits while gaming the system. Wake up and pay attention to what’s going on. Put on your skeptical filters, and stop acting like blind fools. Learn to tell when you’re being spoon-fed misinformation. INSIST ON VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE FROM RELIABLE SOURCES, especially peer-reviewed sources like Wikipedia or academia. Beware of hidden agendas and misinformation from people protecting vested interests.

Copyright ©2014 by Lloyd H. Whitling. Permission to excerpt is granted if accompanied with credit to the author. Permission to reuse whole and unchanged is granted only if accompanied with this notice and proper credit. All other rights reserved.